VOO vs WEBS
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | WEBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.07% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $7M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 3.20% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +13.25% | -33.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.96% | -24.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27% | -50.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.81% | -35.07% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 65.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -99.7% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Nov 7, 2019 |
VOO vs WEBS Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X ETF (WEBS) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year VOO returned +19.96% while WEBS returned -24.27%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.25% versus a loss of 33.66% for WEBS.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.27% per year against -50.26% for WEBS; over five years the annualized figures are +12.81% and -35.07% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.49% annualized vs -52.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WEBS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 65.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -99.7% for WEBS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.76. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while WEBS charges 1.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $107 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 3.20% for WEBS.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and WEBS share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or WEBS?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WEBS charges 1.07%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or WEBS?
Over the past year VOO returned +19.96% vs -24.27% for WEBS, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), VOO annualized +13.49% vs -52.51% for WEBS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or WEBS?
WEBS has been the more volatile fund at 65.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs WEBS -99.7%.
Should I hold both VOO and WEBS?
VOO and WEBS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and WEBS?
VOO and WEBS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or WEBS?
VOO yields 1.08% while WEBS yields 3.20%, so WEBS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.