VOO vs WMTI
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs REX WMT Growth & Income ETF
Which is better, VOO or WMTI?
Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | WMTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.99% |
| AUM | $997.4B | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.04% | 28.83% |
| Holdings | 509 | 6 |
| YTD Return | +14.14%Best | -22.99% |
| 1Y Return | +17.31%Best | -14.56% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.16% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.85% | - |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | REX Shares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Nov 4, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
VOO vs WMTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VOO vs WMTI Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year VOO returned +17.31% while WMTI returned -14.56%. Year to date, VOO is up 14.14% versus a loss of 22.99% for WMTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while WMTI charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $99 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.04% against 28.83% for WMTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 494 holdings in VOO and 1 in WMTI, totalling 99.5% and 0.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 1 in WMTI, against full books of 509 and 6.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VOO and WMTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or WMTI?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WMTI charges 0.99%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $96 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VOO or WMTI?
Over the past year VOO returned +17.31% vs -14.56% for WMTI, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or WMTI?
VOO yields 1.04% while WMTI yields 28.83%, so WMTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WMTI better than VOO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.