VOO vs WZRD
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Opportunistic Trader ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | WZRD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.07% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $16M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | - | |
| Holdings | 509 | 20 | |
| YTD Return | +12.25% | -95.61% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.92% | -96.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.79% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 88.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -98.2% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Opportunistic Trader | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Mar 19, 2024 |
VOO vs WZRD Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) is a ETF from Opportunistic Trader. Over the past year VOO returned +20.92% while WZRD returned -96.19%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.25% versus a loss of 95.61% for WZRD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WZRD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 88.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -98.2% for WZRD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.17. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while WZRD charges 1.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $107 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or WZRD?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WZRD charges 1.07%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or WZRD?
Over the past year VOO returned +20.92% vs -96.19% for WZRD, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), VOO annualized +13.45% vs -93.82% for WZRD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or WZRD?
WZRD has been the more volatile fund at 88.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs WZRD -98.2%.
Should I hold both VOO and WZRD?
VOO and WZRD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.17, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.