VOO vs XC
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs WisdomTree True Emerging Markets Fund
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.32% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $79M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 12.29% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 502 | |
| YTD Return | +13.79% | +0.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +7.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.78% | +10.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 13.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -21.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | WisdomTree Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Sep 20, 2022 |
VOO vs XC Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and WisdomTree True Emerging Markets Fund (XC) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year VOO returned +23.01% while XC returned +7.59%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.79% versus a gain of 0.34% for XC.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.78% per year against +10.88% for XC. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +11.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.9% for XC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -21.0% for XC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XC charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $32 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 12.29% for XC.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and XC share 1 holdings out of 990 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VOO | Weight in XC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PG | 0.53% | 0.01% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XC?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XC charges 0.32%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $29 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or XC?
Over the past year VOO returned +23.01% vs +7.59% for XC, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), VOO annualized +13.57% vs +11.74% for XC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or XC?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.9% for XC. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XC -21.0%.
Should I hold both VOO and XC?
VOO and XC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XC?
VOO and XC share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 990 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XC?
VOO yields 1.09% while XC yields 12.29%, so XC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.