VOO vs XFEB
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XFEB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $31M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +13.44% | +6.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.62% | +10.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 4.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -9.1% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Feb 20, 2024 |
VOO vs XFEB Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February (XFEB) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year VOO returned +22.62% while XFEB returned +10.30%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.44% versus a gain of 6.11% for XFEB.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 4.6% for XFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -9.1% for XFEB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XFEB charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for XFEB.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and XFEB share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XFEB?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XFEB charges 0.85%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or XFEB?
Over the past year VOO returned +22.62% vs +10.30% for XFEB, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), VOO annualized +13.55% vs +10.05% for XFEB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or XFEB?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 4.6% for XFEB. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XFEB -9.1%.
Should I hold both VOO and XFEB?
VOO and XFEB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XFEB?
VOO and XFEB share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XFEB?
VOO yields 1.09% while XFEB yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.