VOO vs XRPC
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Canary XRP ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XRPC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $252M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 2 | |
| YTD Return | +14.48% | -49.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.36% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -56.7% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Canary Capital Group LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Nov 13, 2025 |
VOO vs XRPC Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Canary XRP ETF (XRPC) is a ETF from Canary Capital Group LLC. Year to date, VOO is up 14.48% versus a loss of 49.19% for XRPC.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -56.7% for XRPC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XRPC charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for XRPC.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XRPC?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XRPC charges 0.50%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XRPC?
VOO yields 1.09% while XRPC yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.