VOO vs ZCBA
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | ZCBA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.07% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $977,695.8 | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 1.88% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +12.25% | -0.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.92% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.79% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -2.4% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jan 6, 2026 |
VOO vs ZCBA Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF (ZCBA) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Year to date, VOO is up 12.25% versus a loss of 0.24% for ZCBA.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -2.4% for ZCBA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while ZCBA charges 0.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $7 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 1.88% for ZCBA.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or ZCBA?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZCBA charges 0.07%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or ZCBA?
VOO yields 1.08% while ZCBA yields 1.88%, so ZCBA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.