VTI vs WEAT
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF vs Teucrium Wheat Fund ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WEAT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.00% | |
| AUM | $663.5B | $294M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 29 | |
| YTD Return | +14.22% | +21.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.19% | +15.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27% | -8.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.23% | -7.90% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 23.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -84.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Teucrium | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Sep 19, 2011 |
VTI vs WEAT Performance
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Teucrium Wheat Fund ETF (WEAT) is a ETF from Teucrium. Over the past year VTI returned +22.19% while WEAT returned +15.45%. Year to date, VTI is up 14.22% versus a gain of 21.80% for WEAT.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.27% per year against -8.27% for WEAT; over five years the annualized figures are +12.23% and -7.90% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -10.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WEAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -84.3% for WEAT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WEAT charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $100 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 0.00% for WEAT.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and WEAT share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WEAT?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WEAT charges 1.00%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or WEAT?
Over the past year VTI returned +22.19% vs +15.45% for WEAT, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), VTI annualized +8.14% vs -10.29% for WEAT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or WEAT?
WEAT has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs WEAT -84.3%.
Should I hold both VTI and WEAT?
VTI and WEAT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WEAT?
VTI and WEAT share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WEAT?
VTI yields 1.07% while WEAT yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.