VTI vs WEBS
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF vs Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WEBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.07% | |
| AUM | $663.5B | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 2.83% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +13.87% | -30.77% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.31% | -29.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.17% | -49.82% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.23% | -36.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 65.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -99.7% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Nov 7, 2019 |
VTI vs WEBS Performance
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X ETF (WEBS) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year VTI returned +23.31% while WEBS returned -29.05%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.87% versus a loss of 30.77% for WEBS.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.17% per year against -49.82% for WEBS; over five years the annualized figures are +12.23% and -36.27% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs -52.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WEBS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 65.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -99.7% for WEBS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.77. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WEBS charges 1.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $107 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 2.83% for WEBS.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and WEBS share 0 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WEBS?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WEBS charges 1.07%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or WEBS?
Over the past year VTI returned +23.31% vs -29.05% for WEBS, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), VTI annualized +8.13% vs -52.45% for WEBS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or WEBS?
WEBS has been the more volatile fund at 65.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs WEBS -99.7%.
Should I hold both VTI and WEBS?
VTI and WEBS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WEBS?
VTI and WEBS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WEBS?
VTI yields 1.07% while WEBS yields 2.83%, so WEBS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.