VTI vs WOOD
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WOOD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $268M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 2.34% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 48 | |
| YTD Return | +12.79% | +0.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.47% | -2.97% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.53% | +1.58% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.84% | -1.98% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 22.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -63.8% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Jun 24, 2008 |
VTI vs WOOD Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year VTI returned +20.47% while WOOD returned -2.97%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.79% versus a gain of 0.31% for WOOD.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.53% per year against +1.58% for WOOD; over five years the annualized figures are +11.84% and -1.98% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WOOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -63.8% for WOOD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WOOD charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $39 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 2.34% for WOOD.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and WOOD share 3 holdings out of 2810 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WOOD?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WOOD charges 0.39%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or WOOD?
Over the past year VTI returned +20.47% vs -2.97% for WOOD, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), VTI annualized +8.07% vs +2.78% for WOOD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or WOOD?
WOOD has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs WOOD -63.8%.
Should I hold both VTI and WOOD?
VTI and WOOD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WOOD?
VTI and WOOD share 3 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2810 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WOOD?
VTI yields 1.07% while WOOD yields 2.34%, so WOOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.