VTI vs XIMR
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs FT Vest US Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XIMR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $30M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 6.51% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 14 | |
| YTD Return | +13.14% | +1.37% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.35% | +3.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.83% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.01% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 2.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -5.1% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Mar 18, 2024 |
VTI vs XIMR Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and FT Vest US Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% while XIMR returned +3.14%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.14% versus a gain of 1.37% for XIMR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 2.3% for XIMR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -5.1% for XIMR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XIMR charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 6.51% for XIMR.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and XIMR share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XIMR?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XIMR charges 0.85%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or XIMR?
Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% vs +3.14% for XIMR, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), VTI annualized +8.09% vs +5.39% for XIMR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or XIMR?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 2.3% for XIMR. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs XIMR -5.1%.
Should I hold both VTI and XIMR?
VTI and XIMR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and XIMR?
VTI and XIMR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XIMR?
VTI yields 1.07% while XIMR yields 6.51%, so XIMR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.