VTI vs XOMZ
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Direxion Daily XOM Bear 1X ETF
Which is better, VTI or XOMZ?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Inverse Equity.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XOMZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.01% |
| AUM | $690.1B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 4.36% |
| Holdings | 3,524 | 7 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.4%Best | 23.1% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Inverse Equity |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Apr 23, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 179 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. VTI has data through Oct 6, 2026 and XOMZ through Apr 10, 2026.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XOMZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.1% compared with 10.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XOMZ charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $101 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 4.36% for XOMZ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3,463 holdings in VTI and 3 in XOMZ, totalling 98.1% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 212 days apart, VTI as of Jul 31, 2026 and XOMZ as of Dec 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 3 in XOMZ, against full books of 3,524 and 7.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VTI and XOMZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XOMZ?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XOMZ charges 1.01%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $98 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, VTI or XOMZ?
XOMZ has been the more volatile fund at 23.1% annualized versus 10.4% for VTI.
Should I hold both VTI and XOMZ?
VTI and XOMZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XOMZ?
VTI yields 1.03% while XOMZ yields 4.36%, so XOMZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XOMZ better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.