VTI vs XSVN
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XSVN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $392M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 4.13% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 39 | |
| YTD Return | +13.14% | -1.05% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.35% | +1.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.83% | +3.84% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.01% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 6.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -9.4% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | BondBloxx | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Sep 13, 2022 |
VTI vs XSVN Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) is a ETF from BondBloxx. Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% while XSVN returned +1.45%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.14% versus a loss of 1.05% for XSVN.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.83% per year against +3.84% for XSVN. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 6.6% for XSVN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -9.4% for XSVN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XSVN charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $5 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 4.13% for XSVN.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and XSVN share 0 holdings out of 2812 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XSVN?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XSVN charges 0.05%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or XSVN?
Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% vs +1.45% for XSVN, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), VTI annualized +8.09% vs +2.16% for XSVN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or XSVN?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 6.6% for XSVN. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs XSVN -9.4%.
Should I hold both VTI and XSVN?
VTI and XSVN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and XSVN?
VTI and XSVN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2812 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XSVN?
VTI yields 1.07% while XSVN yields 4.13%, so XSVN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.