VTI vs YCL
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs ProShares Ultra Yen
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | YCL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $32M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 4 | |
| YTD Return | +12.65% | -5.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.39% | -18.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | -12.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.11% | -19.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 18.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -88.7% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Nov 24, 2008 |
VTI vs YCL Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and ProShares Ultra Yen (YCL) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year VTI returned +21.39% while YCL returned -18.53%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.65% versus a loss of 5.56% for YCL.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.54% per year against -12.06% for YCL; over five years the annualized figures are +12.11% and -19.24% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs -9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
YCL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -88.7% for YCL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while YCL charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 0.00% for YCL.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and YCL share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or YCL?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YCL charges 0.95%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or YCL?
Over the past year VTI returned +21.39% vs -18.53% for YCL, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), VTI annualized +8.07% vs -9.38% for YCL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or YCL?
YCL has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs YCL -88.7%.
Should I hold both VTI and YCL?
VTI and YCL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and YCL?
VTI and YCL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or YCL?
VTI yields 1.07% while YCL yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.