VTI vs YJUN
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF vs FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | YJUN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.90% | |
| AUM | $663.5B | $138M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +14.16% | +6.88% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.62% | +12.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.43% | +10.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.33% | +6.29% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 11.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -21.5% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Jun 18, 2021 |
VTI vs YJUN Performance
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (YJUN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year VTI returned +23.62% while YJUN returned +12.06%. Year to date, VTI is up 14.16% versus a gain of 6.88% for YJUN.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.43% per year against +10.40% for YJUN; over five years the annualized figures are +12.33% and +6.29% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +6.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.0% for YJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -21.5% for YJUN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while YJUN charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $90 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 0.00% for YJUN.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and YJUN share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or YJUN?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YJUN charges 0.90%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or YJUN?
Over the past year VTI returned +23.62% vs +12.06% for YJUN, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VTI annualized +8.14% vs +6.28% for YJUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or YJUN?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.0% for YJUN. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs YJUN -21.5%.
Should I hold both VTI and YJUN?
VTI and YJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and YJUN?
VTI and YJUN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or YJUN?
VTI yields 1.07% while YJUN yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.