VTI vs YJUN

VTI vs YJUN

Which is better, VTI or YJUN?

Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVTIYJUN
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.90%
AUM$666.9B$145M
Dividend Yield1.03%0.00%
Holdings3,54310
YTD Return+12.30%Best+5.60%
1Y Return+16.08%Best+8.46%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.01%Best+10.28%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.36%Best+6.29%
Volatility (annualized)15.8%11.0%Best
Max Drawdown-25.4%-21.5%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$17,908Best$13,566
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendOption Writing
InceptionMay 24, 2001Jun 18, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 21, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (5.2 years).

VTI vs YJUN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.

VTI vs YJUN Performance

Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (YJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year VTI returned +16.08% while YJUN returned +8.46%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.30% versus a gain of 5.60% for YJUN.

Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.01% per year against +10.28% for YJUN; over five years the annualized figures are +12.36% and +6.29% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 11.0% for YJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for VTI and -21.5% for YJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VTI charges 0.03% per year while YJUN charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $90 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 0.00% for YJUN.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of VTI and YJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

VTIYJUN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VTI or YJUN?

VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YJUN charges 0.90%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, VTI or YJUN?

Over the past year VTI returned +16.08% vs +8.46% for YJUN, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VTI or YJUN?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 11.0% for YJUN. Worst drawdown: VTI -25.4% vs YJUN -21.5%.

Should I hold both VTI and YJUN?

VTI and YJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or YJUN?

VTI yields 1.03% while YJUN yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is YJUN better than VTI?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.