VTI vs ZAUG

VTI vs ZAUG

Which is better, VTI or ZAUG?

Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVTIZAUG
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.79%
AUM$666.9B$156M
Dividend Yield1.03%0.00%
Holdings3,5435
YTD Return+12.30%Best+4.32%
1Y Return+16.08%Best+5.63%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.01%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.36%-
Volatility (annualized)12.7%3.1%Best
Max Drawdown-19.3%-4.8%Best
$10,000 over 2.1 years$14,267Best$11,579
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Innovator ETFs Trust
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendOption Writing
InceptionMay 24, 2001Jul 31, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 1, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.1 years).

VTI vs ZAUG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.

VTI vs ZAUG Performance

Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year VTI returned +16.08% while ZAUG returned +5.63%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.30% versus a gain of 4.32% for ZAUG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 3.1% for ZAUG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for VTI and -4.8% for ZAUG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VTI charges 0.03% per year while ZAUG charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 0.00% for ZAUG.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 3,463 holdings in VTI and 1 in ZAUG, totalling 98.1% and 101.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 1 in ZAUG, against full books of 3,543 and 5.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of VTI and ZAUG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

VTIZAUG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VTI or ZAUG?

VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZAUG charges 0.79%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, VTI or ZAUG?

Over the past year VTI returned +16.08% vs +5.63% for ZAUG, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), VTI annualized +18.44% vs +7.23% for ZAUG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VTI or ZAUG?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 3.1% for ZAUG. Worst drawdown: VTI -19.3% vs ZAUG -4.8%.

Should I hold both VTI and ZAUG?

VTI and ZAUG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or ZAUG?

VTI yields 1.03% while ZAUG yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZAUG better than VTI?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.