VTI vs ZMUN
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs F/m Ultrashort Tax Free Municipal ETF
Which is better, VTI or ZMUN?
Large Cap Blend against Municipal Bond.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | ZMUN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.30% |
| AUM | $666.9B | $34M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 3.25% |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 175 |
| YTD Return | +12.30%Best | +2.11% |
| 1Y Return | +16.08%Best | +2.87% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.01% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.36% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 0.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | F-m investments |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Municipal Bond |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Sep 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
VTI vs ZMUN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VTI vs ZMUN Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and F/m Ultrashort Tax Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN) is an ETF from F-m investments. Over the past year VTI returned +16.08% while ZMUN returned +2.87%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.30% versus a gain of 2.11% for ZMUN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 0.5% for ZMUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.00. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while ZMUN charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $30 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 3.25% for ZMUN.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3,463 holdings in VTI and 28 in ZMUN, totalling 98.1% and 20.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 28 in ZMUN, against full books of 3,543 and 175.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VTI and ZMUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or ZMUN?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZMUN charges 0.30%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or ZMUN?
Over the past year VTI returned +16.08% vs +2.87% for ZMUN, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or ZMUN?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 0.5% for ZMUN.
Should I hold both VTI and ZMUN?
VTI and ZMUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.00, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or ZMUN?
VTI yields 1.03% while ZMUN yields 3.25%, so ZMUN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZMUN better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.