VWO vs XLV
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF vs State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
Which is better, VWO or XLV?
Each has led over a different period.
VWO has a lower expense ratio. VWO led over 3Y, XLV over 1Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VWO | XLV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.08% |
| AUM | $122.0B | $44.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.29% | 1.49% |
| Holdings | 6,334 | 63 |
| YTD Return | +10.00%Best | +7.24% |
| 1Y Return | +15.58% | +20.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.69%Best | +9.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.01% | +6.27%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 13.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -68.3% | -40.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,389 | $13,554Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2005 | Dec 16, 1998 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 10, 2005 to Sep 11, 2026 (21.5 years).
VWO vs XLV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.5 years both funds cover.
VWO vs XLV Performance
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year VWO returned +15.58% while XLV returned +20.42%. Year to date, VWO is up 10.00% versus a gain of 7.24% for XLV.
Over three years, VWO compounded at +17.69% per year against +9.41% for XLV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.01% and +6.27% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, XLV has the edge at +8.63% annualized vs +4.96%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VWO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 13.8% for XLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.3% for VWO and -40.6% for XLV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VWO charges 0.06% per year while XLV charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $8 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VWO currently yields 2.29% against 1.49% for XLV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 4,694 holdings in VWO and 61 in XLV, totalling 88.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 4,694 positions we hold weights for in VWO and 61 in XLV, against full books of 6,334 and 63.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 4,694 and 61 positions we hold weights for.
VWO holds 28 positions XLV does not, 1.9% of the fund.
Largest: ASX 0.61%, JD 0.26%, PBR 0.25%, AMXLMM 3.625 04/22/2 0.16%, IMP 0.08%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VWO and XLV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VWO or XLV?
VWO has an expense ratio of 0.06% while XLV charges 0.08%. VWO is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VWO or XLV?
Over the past year VWO returned +15.58% vs +20.42% for XLV, so XLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), VWO annualized +4.96% vs +8.63% for XLV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VWO or XLV?
VWO has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 13.8% for XLV. Worst drawdown: VWO -68.3% vs XLV -40.6%.
Should I hold both VWO and XLV?
VWO and XLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, VWO or XLV?
VWO yields 2.29% while XLV yields 1.49%, so VWO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XLV better than VWO?
VWO has a lower expense ratio. VWO led over 3Y, XLV over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.