VXUS vs XSMO
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. XSMO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VXUS | XSMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.36% | |
| AUM | $156.5B | $3.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.60% | 0.51% | |
| Holdings | 8,747 | 115 | |
| YTD Return | +15.00% | +22.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.87% | +27.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.79% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.26% | +11.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 275.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -78.8% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2011 | Mar 3, 2005 |
VXUS vs XSMO Performance
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year VXUS returned +26.87% while XSMO returned +27.23%. Year to date, VXUS is up 15.00% versus a gain of 22.95% for XSMO.
Over three years, VXUS compounded at +19.79% per year against +22.16% for XSMO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.26% and +11.59% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, XSMO has the edge at +14.96% annualized vs +4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XSMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 275.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for VXUS and -78.8% for XSMO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VXUS charges 0.05% per year while XSMO charges 0.36%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $36 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VXUS currently yields 2.60% against 0.51% for XSMO.
Holdings Overlap
VXUS and XSMO share 3 holdings out of 7969 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VXUS or XSMO?
VXUS has an expense ratio of 0.05% while XSMO charges 0.36%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VXUS or XSMO?
Over the past year VXUS returned +26.87% vs +27.23% for XSMO, so XSMO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VXUS annualized +4.88% vs +14.96% for XSMO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VXUS or XSMO?
XSMO has been the more volatile fund at 275.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: VXUS -39.9% vs XSMO -78.8%.
Should I hold both VXUS and XSMO?
VXUS and XSMO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VXUS and XSMO?
VXUS and XSMO share 3 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7969 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VXUS or XSMO?
VXUS yields 2.60% while XSMO yields 0.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.