VOO vs WWJD
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Inspire International ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | WWJD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.66% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $548M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.58% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 414 | |
| YTD Return | +14.48% | +11.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +18.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +16.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.36% | +7.80% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 18.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -35.8% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Inspire ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Sep 30, 2019 |
VOO vs WWJD Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Inspire International ETF (WWJD) is a ETF from Inspire ETFs. Over the past year VOO returned +22.02% while WWJD returned +18.35%. Year to date, VOO is up 14.48% versus a gain of 11.46% for WWJD.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.80% per year against +16.43% for WWJD; over five years the annualized figures are +13.36% and +7.80% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WWJD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -35.8% for WWJD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while WWJD charges 0.66%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $66 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 2.58% for WWJD.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or WWJD?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WWJD charges 0.66%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or WWJD?
Over the past year VOO returned +22.02% vs +18.35% for WWJD, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), VOO annualized +13.61% vs +11.42% for WWJD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or WWJD?
WWJD has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs WWJD -35.8%.
Should I hold both VOO and WWJD?
VOO and WWJD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and WWJD?
VOO and WWJD share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 702 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or WWJD?
VOO yields 1.09% while WWJD yields 2.58%, so WWJD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.