VYM vs YINN
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | YINN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 1.34% | |
| AUM | $79.0B | $696M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.86% | 1.76% | |
| Holdings | 568 | 13 | |
| YTD Return | +16.53% | -38.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.03% | -33.42% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.54% | -3.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.25% | -34.17% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 71.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -98.9% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Dec 3, 2009 |
VYM vs YINN Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X ETF (YINN) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year VYM returned +25.03% while YINN returned -33.42%. Year to date, VYM is up 16.53% versus a loss of 38.60% for YINN.
Over three years, VYM compounded at +18.54% per year against -3.72% for YINN; over five years the annualized figures are +12.25% and -34.17% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs -17.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
YINN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 71.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for VYM and -98.9% for YINN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while YINN charges 1.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $134 annually, a gap of $130 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.86% against 1.76% for YINN.
Holdings Overlap
VYM and YINN share 0 holdings out of 563 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or YINN?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while YINN charges 1.34%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $130 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VYM or YINN?
Over the past year VYM returned +25.03% vs -33.42% for YINN, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), VYM annualized +7.10% vs -17.63% for YINN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VYM or YINN?
YINN has been the more volatile fund at 71.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: VYM -58.8% vs YINN -98.9%.
Should I hold both VYM and YINN?
VYM and YINN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and YINN?
VYM and YINN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 563 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or YINN?
VYM yields 2.86% while YINN yields 1.76%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.