VOO vs YINN
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | YINN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.34% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $696M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.76% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 13 | |
| YTD Return | +14.48% | -40.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -40.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | -4.74% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.36% | -34.60% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 71.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -98.9% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Dec 3, 2009 |
VOO vs YINN Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X ETF (YINN) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year VOO returned +22.02% while YINN returned -40.75%. Year to date, VOO is up 14.48% versus a loss of 40.54% for YINN.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.80% per year against -4.74% for YINN; over five years the annualized figures are +13.36% and -34.60% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs -17.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
YINN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 71.6% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -98.9% for YINN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while YINN charges 1.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $134 annually, a gap of $131 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 1.76% for YINN.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and YINN share 0 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or YINN?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YINN charges 1.34%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $131 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or YINN?
Over the past year VOO returned +22.02% vs -40.75% for YINN, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VOO annualized +13.61% vs -17.79% for YINN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or YINN?
YINN has been the more volatile fund at 71.6% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs YINN -98.9%.
Should I hold both VOO and YINN?
VOO and YINN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and YINN?
VOO and YINN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or YINN?
VOO yields 1.09% while YINN yields 1.76%, so YINN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.