VYM vs ZINN
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth ETF
Which is better, VYM or ZINN?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | ZINN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $81.6B | $128M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.22% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 613 | 34 |
| YTD Return | +12.29%Best | -5.01% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.42% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.12% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.1%Best | 56.0% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Virtus Investment Partners |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Aug 31, 2015 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
VYM vs ZINN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VYM vs ZINN Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth ETF (ZINN) is an ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Year to date, VYM is up 12.29% versus a loss of 5.01% for ZINN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while ZINN charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $75 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.22% against 0.00% for ZINN.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 557 holdings in VYM and 34 in ZINN, totalling 99.2% and 99.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 557 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 34 in ZINN, against full books of 613 and 34.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 29 positions for ZINN that do not appear in our book for VYM (88.8% of the fund), and 528 for VYM that do not appear in ZINN (97.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VYM and ZINN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or ZINN?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while ZINN charges 0.75%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or ZINN?
VYM yields 2.22% while ZINN yields 0.00%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZINN better than VYM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.