QQQ vs ZINN

QQQ vs ZINN

Which is better, QQQ or ZINN?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.0%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQZINN
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.75%
AUM$483.5B$128M
Dividend Yield0.44%0.00%
Holdings10734
YTD Return+17.21%Best-5.01%
1Y Return+22.10%-
3Y Return (annualized)+25.27%-
5Y Return (annualized)+14.60%-
Top 10 Weight46.5%Best56.0%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Virtus Investment Partners
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 10, 1999Aug 31, 2015

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs ZINN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs ZINN Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth ETF (ZINN) is an ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.21% versus a loss of 5.01% for ZINN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while ZINN charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $75 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for ZINN.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in ZINN33.6%
ZINN already in QQQ62.2%

33.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings ZINN also owns. 62.2% of ZINN's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

13 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 34 in ZINN, against full books of 107 and 34.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 17 positions for ZINN that do not appear in our book for QQQ (32.7% of the fund), and 84 for QQQ that do not appear in ZINN (64.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in ZINNDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.44%8.93%0.49%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.67%5.14%0.47%
TSLATesla Inc2.56%6.71%4.15%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.45%5.70%2.25%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.76%2.58%3.18%
GOOGAlphabet Inc3.13%4.24%1.11%
SHOP:CAShopify Inc0.77%6.11%5.34%
MELIMercadolibre Inc0.43%5.26%4.83%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.78%2.67%0.11%
AXONAxon Enterprise Inc0.22%5.00%4.78%

62.2% of ZINN is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQZINN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or ZINN?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while ZINN charges 0.75%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and ZINN?

62.2% of ZINN's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 62.2% of ZINN's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 34 in ZINN.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or ZINN?

QQQ yields 0.44% while ZINN yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZINN better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.