ABLS vs IVV
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $480,507.06 | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 49 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.69% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.23% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Abacus FCF Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
ABLS vs IVV Performance
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) is a ETF from Abacus FCF Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ABLS returned +14.23% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, ABLS is up 18.69% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for ABLS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLS charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLS currently yields 0.96% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ABLS and IVV share 0 holdings out of 552 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLS or IVV?
ABLS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABLS or IVV?
Over the past year ABLS returned +14.23% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ABLS annualized +4.94% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABLS or IVV?
ABLS has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ABLS -19.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ABLS and IVV?
ABLS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLS and IVV?
ABLS and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 552 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLS or IVV?
ABLS yields 0.96% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.