ABLS vs IVV
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ABLS or IVV?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLS | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $460,516.49 | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 49 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +12.33% | +13.86%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.86% | +21.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $10,161 | $12,774Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.2% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Abacus FCF Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 19, 2025 to Sep 3, 2026 (1.5 years).
ABLS vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
ABLS vs IVV Performance
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) is an ETF from Abacus FCF Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ABLS returned +6.86% while IVV returned +21.57%. Year to date, ABLS is up 12.33% versus a gain of 13.86% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 13.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for ABLS and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLS charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLS currently yields 0.96% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 46 holdings in ABLS and 505 in IVV, totalling 97.4% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in ABLS and 505 in IVV, against full books of 49 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 497 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ABLS (99.3% of the fund), and 45 for ABLS that do not appear in IVV (96.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLS and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLS or IVV?
ABLS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLS or IVV?
Over the past year ABLS returned +6.86% vs +21.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ABLS annualized +1.07% vs +17.73% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLS or IVV?
ABLS has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 13.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ABLS -19.3% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both ABLS and IVV?
ABLS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLS or IVV?
ABLS yields 0.96% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ABLS?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.