ABLS vs QQQ
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $480,507.06 | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 49 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +18.69% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.23% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Abacus FCF Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ABLS vs QQQ Performance
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) is a ETF from Abacus FCF Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ABLS returned +14.23% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, ABLS is up 18.69% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.5% for ABLS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for ABLS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLS charges 0.39% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $18 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLS currently yields 0.96% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
ABLS and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 149 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLS or QQQ?
ABLS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABLS or QQQ?
Over the past year ABLS returned +14.23% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ABLS annualized +4.94% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABLS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.5% for ABLS. Worst drawdown: ABLS -19.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ABLS and QQQ?
ABLS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLS and QQQ?
ABLS and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 149 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLS or QQQ?
ABLS yields 0.96% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ABLS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.