ABLS vs VTI
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $480,507.06 | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 49 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.69% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.23% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Abacus FCF Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
ABLS vs VTI Performance
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) is a ETF from Abacus FCF Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABLS returned +14.23% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, ABLS is up 18.69% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for ABLS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLS charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLS currently yields 0.96% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ABLS and VTI share 39 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLS or VTI?
ABLS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABLS or VTI?
Over the past year ABLS returned +14.23% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ABLS annualized +4.94% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABLS or VTI?
ABLS has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ABLS -19.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ABLS and VTI?
ABLS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLS and VTI?
ABLS and VTI share 39 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLS or VTI?
ABLS yields 0.96% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.