ABLS vs SCHD
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, ABLS or SCHD?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLS | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $448,100.93 | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 49 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +3.75% | +21.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.24% | +25.15%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.32% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 14.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -14.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $9,386 | $12,419Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.9% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Abacus FCF Advisors | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 19, 2025 to Sep 24, 2026 (1.6 years).
ABLS vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
ABLS vs SCHD Performance
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) is an ETF from Abacus FCF Advisors and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ABLS returned -0.24% while SCHD returned +25.15%. Year to date, ABLS is up 3.75% versus a gain of 21.33% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 14.4% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for ABLS and -14.0% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLS charges 0.39% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $6 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLS currently yields 0.98% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
8.0% of ABLS's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 0.1% of SCHD's money is in holdings ABLS also owns.
ABLS and SCHD share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in ABLS and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 49 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for ABLS (99.8% of the fund), and 42 for ABLS that do not appear in SCHD (88.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLS and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLS or SCHD?
ABLS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLS or SCHD?
Over the past year ABLS returned -0.24% vs +25.15% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ABLS annualized -3.88% vs +14.50% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLS or SCHD?
ABLS has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 14.4% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: ABLS -19.3% vs SCHD -14.0%.
Should I hold both ABLS and SCHD?
ABLS and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLS and SCHD?
8.0% of ABLS's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 0.1% of SCHD's is in holdings ABLS also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in ABLS and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLS or SCHD?
ABLS yields 0.98% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than ABLS?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.