ACHP vs IVV
Global X Asia Semiconductor ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ACHP or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACHP | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $410,230 | $879.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% |
| Holdings | 24 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -14.52% | +11.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +13.50% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.45% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.61% |
| Top 10 Weight | 69.7% | 37.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACHP vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACHP vs IVV Performance
Global X Asia Semiconductor ETF (ACHP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ACHP is down 14.52% versus a gain of 11.33% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACHP charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACHP currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 24 holdings in ACHP and 490 in IVV, totalling 98.1% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in ACHP and 490 in IVV, against full books of 24 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 485 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ACHP (98.8% of the fund), and 1 for ACHP that do not appear in IVV (11.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACHP and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACHP or IVV?
ACHP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACHP or IVV?
ACHP yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ACHP?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.