ACHP vs VXUS
Global X Asia Semiconductor ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, ACHP or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACHP | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $410,230 | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.38% |
| Holdings | 24 | 9,293 |
| YTD Return | -14.52% | +8.76%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +13.05% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.91% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.89% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACHP vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACHP vs VXUS Performance
Global X Asia Semiconductor ETF (ACHP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ACHP is down 14.52% versus a gain of 8.76% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACHP charges 0.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $5 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACHP currently yields 0.00% against 2.38% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 59.7% of ACHP's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 89.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in ACHP and 8,462 in VXUS, against full books of 24 and 9,293.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACHP | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005930:KRSamsung Electronics Co Ltd | 10.42% | 2.02% | 8.40% |
| 2454:TWMediatek Inc | 11.43% | 0.50% | 10.93% |
| 688256:SHCambricon Technologies Corp Common Stock | 4.72% | 0.01% | 4.71% |
| 6723:JPRenesas Electronics Corp | 4.44% | 0.08% | 4.36% |
| 2408:TWNanya Technology Corp | 4.16% | 0.05% | 4.11% |
| 285A:JPKioxia Holdings Corporation Com Stk | 3.41% | 0.30% | 3.11% |
| 688008:SHMontage Technology Co Ltd | 3.61% | 0.00% | 3.61% |
| 688041:SHHygon Information Technology Co Ltd Class A | 3.58% | 0.01% | 3.57% |
| 603986:SHGigadevice Semiconductor Inc | 3.56% | 0.01% | 3.55% |
| 3443:TWGlobal Unichip Corp | 2.61% | 0.04% | 2.57% |
59.7% of ACHP is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACHP or VXUS?
ACHP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACHP and VXUS?
At least 59.7% of ACHP's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in ACHP and 8,462 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACHP or VXUS?
ACHP yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.38%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than ACHP?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.