ACHP vs VYM
Global X Asia Semiconductor ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, ACHP or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACHP | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $410,230 | $95.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.23% |
| Holdings | 24 | 610 |
| YTD Return | -14.52% | +15.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.48% |
| Top 10 Weight | 69.7% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACHP vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACHP vs VYM Performance
Global X Asia Semiconductor ETF (ACHP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ACHP is down 14.52% versus a gain of 15.95% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACHP charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACHP currently yields 0.00% against 2.23% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 24 holdings in ACHP and 602 in VYM, totalling 98.1% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 66 days apart, ACHP as of Nov 5, 2026 and VYM as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in ACHP and 602 in VYM, against full books of 24 and 610.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 576 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for ACHP (98.6% of the fund), and 1 for ACHP that do not appear in VYM (11.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACHP and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACHP or VYM?
ACHP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACHP or VYM?
ACHP yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.23%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than ACHP?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.