ACIG vs IVV
Hartford Alpha Capture International Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ACIG or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $15M | $850.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% |
| Holdings | 84 | 1,018 |
| YTD Return | -4.17% | +8.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +10.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.97% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACIG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACIG vs IVV Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture International Growth ETF (ACIG) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ACIG is down 4.17% versus a gain of 8.54% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIG charges 0.56% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIG currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 84 holdings in ACIG and 505 in IVV, totalling 78.4% and 100.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in ACIG and 505 in IVV, against full books of 84 and 1,018.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACIG and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIG or IVV?
ACIG has an expense ratio of 0.56% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIG or IVV?
ACIG yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ACIG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.