ACMG vs FTG

ACMG vs FTG

Which is better, ACMG or FTG?

ACMG costs less.

ACMG has a lower expense ratio. FTG is less concentrated, with 31.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%.

Lower Fees: ACMGLess Concentrated: FTG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACMGFTG
Expense Ratio0.39%Best0.79%
AUM$93M$6M
Dividend Yield0.11%0.00%
Holdings3596
YTD Return-8.40%Best-13.30%
Top 10 Weight52.3%31.3%Best
Fund FamilyAmerican Century InvestmentsFuller & Thaler Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthMid Cap Growth
InceptionJul 13, 2020Aug 18, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACMG vs FTG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ACMG against instead:ACMG vs SPYACMG vs QQQACMG vs VOOACMG vs VTIFTG against:FTG vs VXUS

ACMG vs FTG Performance

American Century Mid Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACMG) is an ETF from American Century Investments and FullerThaler Behavioral Growth ETF (FTG) is an ETF from Fuller & Thaler Asset Management. Year to date, ACMG is down 8.40% versus a loss of 13.30% for FTG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACMG charges 0.39% per year while FTG charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $79 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACMG currently yields 0.11% against 0.00% for FTG.

Holdings Overlap

ACMG already in FTG12.0%
FTG already in ACMG12.7%

12.0% of ACMG's money is in holdings FTG also owns. 12.7% of FTG's money is in holdings ACMG also owns.

FTG and ACMG share little of their money.

6 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in ACMG and 47 in FTG, against full books of 35 and 96.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 40 positions for FTG that do not appear in our book for ACMG (83.9% of the fund), and 25 for ACMG that do not appear in FTG (81.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACMGWeight in FTGDifference
MTSIMacom Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.4.78%1.83%2.95%
NTRANatera Inc2.06%2.73%0.67%
DXCMDexcom Inc.1.51%2.92%1.41%
AFRMAffirm Inc1.10%2.30%1.20%
AXONAxon Enterprise Inc1.31%1.41%0.10%
INSMInsmed Inc1.22%1.50%0.28%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ACMG and FTG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ACMGFTG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACMG or FTG?

ACMG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while FTG charges 0.79%. ACMG is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACMG and FTG?

12.7% of FTG's money is in holdings ACMG also owns. 12.7% of FTG's is in holdings ACMG also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in ACMG and 47 in FTG.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACMG or FTG?

ACMG yields 0.11% while FTG yields 0.00%, so ACMG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FTG better than ACMG?

ACMG has a lower expense ratio. FTG is less concentrated, with 31.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.