ACMG vs IVV
American Century Mid Cap Growth Insights ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ACMG or IVV?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACMG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $93M | $850.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.11% | 1.09% |
| Holdings | 35 | 1,018 |
| YTD Return | -12.25% | +8.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +10.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.97% |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.3% | 38.8%Best |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACMG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACMG vs IVV Performance
American Century Mid Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACMG) is an ETF from American Century Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ACMG is down 12.25% versus a gain of 8.54% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACMG charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACMG currently yields 0.11% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
50.8% of ACMG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.2% of IVV's money is in holdings ACMG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in ACMG and 505 in IVV, against full books of 35 and 1,018.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 483 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ACMG (98.4% of the fund), and 15 for ACMG that do not appear in IVV (42.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACMG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 5.47% | 0.09% | 5.38% |
| JCIJohnson Controls Intl Plc | 4.91% | 0.14% | 4.77% |
| CDNSCadence Design | 4.76% | 0.14% | 4.62% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 4.68% | 0.09% | 4.59% |
| CMGChipotle Mexican Grill Inc. Class A | 4.58% | 0.06% | 4.52% |
| HUBBHubbell Inc. Class B | 4.19% | 0.04% | 4.15% |
| HLTHilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. | 3.82% | 0.11% | 3.71% |
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 3.17% | 0.07% | 3.10% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 3.02% | 0.13% | 2.89% |
| RDDTReddit Inc Series C Pc Pp | 2.62% | 0.03% | 2.59% |
50.8% of ACMG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACMG or IVV?
ACMG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACMG and IVV?
50.8% of ACMG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.2% of IVV's is in holdings ACMG also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in ACMG and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACMG or IVV?
ACMG yields 0.11% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ACMG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.