ACMG vs QQQ

ACMG vs QQQ

Which is better, ACMG or QQQ?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns (1Y): QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACMGQQQ
Expense Ratio0.39%0.18%Best
AUM$93M$437.3B
Dividend Yield0.11%0.43%
Holdings35208
YTD Return-12.25%+7.37%Best
1Y Return-+7.77%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.44%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.19%
Top 10 Weight52.3%46.9%Best
Fund FamilyAmerican Century InvestmentsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJul 13, 2020Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACMG vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ACMG vs QQQ Performance

American Century Mid Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACMG) is an ETF from American Century Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, ACMG is down 12.25% versus a gain of 7.37% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACMG charges 0.39% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $18 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACMG currently yields 0.11% against 0.43% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

ACMG already in QQQ18.4%
QQQ already in ACMG1.2%

18.4% of ACMG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings ACMG also owns.

ACMG and QQQ share little of their money.

6 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in ACMG and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 35 and 208.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 88 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ACMG (96.0% of the fund), and 25 for ACMG that do not appear in QQQ (74.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACMGWeight in QQQDifference
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc5.47%0.26%5.21%
CDNSCadence Design4.76%0.38%4.38%
ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc.3.14%0.13%3.01%
IDXXIdexx Laboratories Inc.2.24%0.18%2.06%
DXCMDexcom Inc.1.51%0.14%1.37%
AXONAxon Enterprise Inc1.31%0.14%1.17%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ACMG and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ACMGQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACMG or QQQ?

ACMG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACMG and QQQ?

18.4% of ACMG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.2% of QQQ's is in holdings ACMG also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in ACMG and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACMG or QQQ?

ACMG yields 0.11% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than ACMG?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.