ACSM vs QQQ
Hartford Alpha Capture SMID Cap ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, ACSM or QQQ?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ACSM is less concentrated, with 11.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACSM | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 202 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +1.07% | +7.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +7.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.19% |
| Top 10 Weight | 11.2%Best | 46.9% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACSM vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACSM vs QQQ Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture SMID Cap ETF (ACSM) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, ACSM is up 1.07% versus a gain of 7.37% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACSM charges 0.52% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $18 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSM currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
2.2% of ACSM's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings ACSM also owns.
ACSM and QQQ share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 202 positions we hold weights for in ACSM and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 202 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 89 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ACSM (95.9% of the fund), and 194 for ACSM that do not appear in QQQ (92.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACSM and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACSM or QQQ?
ACSM has an expense ratio of 0.52% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACSM and QQQ?
2.2% of ACSM's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.3% of QQQ's is in holdings ACSM also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 202 positions we hold weights for in ACSM and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACSM or QQQ?
ACSM yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than ACSM?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ACSM is less concentrated, with 11.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.