ACSM vs VTI

ACSM vs VTI

Which is better, ACSM or VTI?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. ACSM is less concentrated, with 11.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: ACSM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACSMVTI
Expense Ratio0.52%0.03%Best
AUM$20M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings2023,542
YTD Return+1.07%+8.54%Best
1Y Return-+11.14%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.29%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.84%
Top 10 Weight11.2%Best34.6%
Fund FamilyHartford FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 29, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACSM vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ACSM vs VTI Performance

Hartford Alpha Capture SMID Cap ETF (ACSM) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ACSM is up 1.07% versus a gain of 8.54% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACSM charges 0.52% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $3 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSM currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

ACSM already in VTI93.7%
VTI already in ACSM2.9%

93.7% of ACSM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.9% of VTI's money is in holdings ACSM also owns.

Most of ACSM is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

197 positions in common, counted across the 202 positions we hold weights for in ACSM and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 202 and 3,542.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 990 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ACSM (94.1% of the fund), and 3 for ACSM that do not appear in VTI (1.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACSMWeight in VTIDifference
SSBSouthstate Bank Corp1.33%0.01%1.32%
PNFPPinnacle Financial Partners Inc1.25%0.02%1.23%
UDRUdr Inc.1.16%0.01%1.15%
VVVValvoline Inc1.10%0.01%1.09%
BCCBoise Cascade Company1.10%0.00%1.10%
CPTCamden Property Trust Common Stock1.08%0.01%1.07%
PPGPpg Industries Inc.1.06%0.03%1.03%
BOXBox Inc - Class A1.06%0.01%1.05%
DOVDover Corp.1.03%0.03%1.00%
TREXTrex Co Inc1.03%0.01%1.02%

93.7% of ACSM is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACSMVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACSM or VTI?

ACSM has an expense ratio of 0.52% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACSM and VTI?

93.7% of ACSM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.9% of VTI's is in holdings ACSM also owns. They hold 197 positions in common, counted across the 202 positions we hold weights for in ACSM and 3,464 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACSM or VTI?

ACSM yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than ACSM?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. ACSM is less concentrated, with 11.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.