ACSM vs VOO

ACSM vs VOO

Which is better, ACSM or VOO?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. ACSM is less concentrated, with 11.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: ACSM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACSMVOO
Expense Ratio0.52%0.03%Best
AUM$20M$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.00%1.05%
Holdings202519
YTD Return+1.07%+8.52%Best
1Y Return-+10.96%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.51%
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.97%
Top 10 Weight11.2%Best39.1%
Fund FamilyHartford FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 29, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACSM vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ACSM vs VOO Performance

Hartford Alpha Capture SMID Cap ETF (ACSM) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ACSM is up 1.07% versus a gain of 8.52% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACSM charges 0.52% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $3 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSM currently yields 0.00% against 1.05% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

ACSM already in VOO17.7%
VOO already in ACSM1.7%

17.7% of ACSM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.7% of VOO's money is in holdings ACSM also owns.

ACSM and VOO share little of their money.

32 positions in common, counted across the 202 positions we hold weights for in ACSM and 506 in VOO, against full books of 202 and 519.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 469 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ACSM (98.2% of the fund), and 167 for ACSM that do not appear in VOO (77.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACSMWeight in VOODifference
UDRUdr Inc.1.16%0.01%1.15%
PPGPpg Industries Inc.1.06%0.04%1.02%
CPTCamden Property Trust Common Stock1.08%0.01%1.07%
DOVDover Corp.1.03%0.04%0.99%
HALHalliburton Co.0.89%0.04%0.85%
MTBM&T Bank Corp0.79%0.05%0.74%
KIMKimco Realty Corp.0.80%0.02%0.78%
RVTYRevvity Inc0.76%0.03%0.73%
FANGDiamondback Energy Inc.0.71%0.06%0.65%
FIXComfort Systems USA Inc.0.65%0.09%0.56%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ACSM and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ACSMVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACSM or VOO?

ACSM has an expense ratio of 0.52% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACSM and VOO?

17.7% of ACSM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.7% of VOO's is in holdings ACSM also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 202 positions we hold weights for in ACSM and 506 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACSM or VOO?

ACSM yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.05%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than ACSM?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. ACSM is less concentrated, with 11.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.