ACTS vs IVV

ACTS vs IVV

Which is better, ACTS or IVV?

Equity Tactical Allocation against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.0%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACTSIVV
Expense Ratio0.69%0.03%Best
AUM$10M$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings36508
YTD Return+4.30%+13.85%Best
1Y Return-+18.57%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.50%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.34%
Top 10 Weight43.0%37.8%Best
Fund FamilyFaith Investor ServicesiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
StyleEquity Tactical AllocationLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 19, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACTS vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ACTS vs IVV Performance

FIS Tactical Equity ETF (ACTS) is an ETF from Faith Investor Services and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ACTS is up 4.30% versus a gain of 13.85% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACTS charges 0.69% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACTS currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

ACTS already in IVV39.8%
IVV already in ACTS4.3%

39.8% of ACTS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.3% of IVV's money is in holdings ACTS also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

15 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ACTS and 490 in IVV, against full books of 36 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 467 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ACTS (94.4% of the fund), and 16 for ACTS that do not appear in IVV (50.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACTSWeight in IVVDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.27%2.65%0.38%
CASYCaseys General4.38%0.04%4.34%
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc4.25%0.09%4.16%
IBKRInteractive Brokers Group Inc4.06%0.07%3.99%
ORLYO'Eilly Automotive, Inc.2.83%0.11%2.72%
DGDollar General Corp.2.84%0.04%2.80%
WSTWest Pharmaceutical Services Inc2.79%0.04%2.75%
IDXXIdexx Labs2.71%0.07%2.64%
CATCaterpillar, Inc.2.15%0.55%1.60%
KLACKla Corp2.00%0.35%1.65%

39.8% of ACTS is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACTSIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACTS or IVV?

ACTS has an expense ratio of 0.69% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACTS and IVV?

39.8% of ACTS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.3% of IVV's is in holdings ACTS also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ACTS and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACTS or IVV?

ACTS yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than ACTS?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.