ACTS vs VYM

ACTS vs VYM

Which is better, ACTS or VYM?

Equity Tactical Allocation against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACTSVYM
Expense Ratio0.69%0.04%Best
AUM$11M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.24%
Holdings36613
YTD Return+6.39%+14.82%Best
1Y Return-+20.84%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.64%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.28%
Top 10 Weight44.2%25.9%Best
Fund FamilyFaith Investor ServicesVanguard (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
StyleEquity Tactical AllocationLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 19, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACTS vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ACTS vs VYM Performance

FIS Tactical Equity ETF (ACTS) is an ETF from Faith Investor Services and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ACTS is up 6.39% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACTS charges 0.69% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $4 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACTS currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

ACTS already in VYM22.6%
VYM already in ACTS9.7%

22.6% of ACTS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.7% of VYM's money is in holdings ACTS also owns.

ACTS and VYM share little of their money.

9 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ACTS and 603 in VYM, against full books of 36 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 561 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for ACTS (87.7% of the fund), and 21 for ACTS that do not appear in VYM (64.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACTSWeight in VYMDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.49%7.29%4.80%
AMKRAmkor Technology, Inc.4.35%0.04%4.31%
CATCaterpillar, Inc.2.22%2.01%0.21%
FCFSFirstcash Inc3.82%0.04%3.78%
DGDollar General Corp.2.64%0.11%2.53%
ALLEAllegion Plc2.12%0.05%2.07%
JKHYJack Henry & Associates Inc1.74%0.04%1.70%
HLIHoulihan Lokey, Inc.1.70%0.03%1.67%
EQTEQT Corp.1.49%0.13%1.36%

22.6% of ACTS is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACTSVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACTS or VYM?

ACTS has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACTS and VYM?

22.6% of ACTS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.7% of VYM's is in holdings ACTS also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in ACTS and 603 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACTS or VYM?

ACTS yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than ACTS?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.