ACYQ vs IVV
FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACYQ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $32M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +4.25% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
ACYQ vs IVV Performance
FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF (ACYQ) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ACYQ is up 4.25% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.5% for ACYQ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACYQ charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACYQ currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACYQ or IVV?
ACYQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACYQ or IVV?
ACYQ yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.