AFSC vs IVV
abrdn Focused US Small Cap Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AFSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AFSC | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $11M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 45 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +30.41% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.67% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 31, 1997 | May 15, 2000 |
AFSC vs IVV Performance
abrdn Focused US Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) is a ETF from Aberdeen and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AFSC returned +36.67% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, AFSC is up 30.41% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AFSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.7% for AFSC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AFSC charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AFSC currently yields 0.06% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AFSC and IVV share 0 holdings out of 549 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AFSC or IVV?
AFSC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AFSC or IVV?
Over the past year AFSC returned +36.67% vs +21.79% for IVV, so AFSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AFSC annualized +22.38% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AFSC or IVV?
AFSC has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AFSC -21.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AFSC and IVV?
AFSC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AFSC and IVV?
AFSC and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 549 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AFSC or IVV?
AFSC yields 0.06% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.