AFSC vs IVV
abrdn Focused US Small Cap Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AFSC or IVV?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AFSC led over 1Y, IVV over the full window. AFSC is less concentrated, with 30.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AFSC | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 45 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +23.40%Best | +13.39% |
| 1Y Return | +24.87%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.7% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $12,685 | $12,740Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.2%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 31, 1997 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 18, 2025 to Sep 4, 2026 (1.5 years).
AFSC vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
AFSC vs IVV Performance
abrdn Focused US Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) is an ETF from Aberdeen and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AFSC returned +24.87% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, AFSC is up 23.40% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AFSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 13.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.7% for AFSC and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AFSC charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AFSC currently yields 0.06% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 43 holdings in AFSC and 504 in IVV, totalling 98.3% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 43 positions we hold weights for in AFSC and 504 in IVV, against full books of 45 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 43 and 504 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 493 positions AFSC does not, 99.2% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.98%, AAPL 6.86%, MSFT 5.44%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AFSC and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AFSC or IVV?
AFSC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AFSC or IVV?
Over the past year AFSC returned +24.87% vs +20.08% for IVV, so AFSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AFSC annualized +17.18% vs +17.52% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AFSC or IVV?
AFSC has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 13.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AFSC -21.7% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both AFSC and IVV?
AFSC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AFSC or IVV?
AFSC yields 0.06% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AFSC?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AFSC led over 1Y, IVV over the full window. AFSC is less concentrated, with 30.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.