AGG vs NUIB
iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF vs Nuveen Impact Bond ETF
Which is better, AGG or NUIB?
AGG costs less.
AGG has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGG | NUIB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.37% |
| AUM | $137.6B | $45M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.19% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 13,338 | 58 |
| YTD Return | -1.51% | +0.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.41% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.76% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.36% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Nuveen |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Sep 22, 2003 | Sep 14, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight, Style.
AGG vs NUIB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AGG vs NUIB Performance
iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Nuveen Impact Bond ETF (NUIB) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, AGG is down 1.51% versus a gain of 0.01% for NUIB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGG charges 0.03% per year while NUIB charges 0.37%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $37 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGG currently yields 4.19% against 0.00% for NUIB.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 11,115 holdings in AGG and 58 in NUIB, totalling 67.1% and 64.0% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 33 positions appear in both.
33 positions in common, counted across the 11,115 positions we hold weights for in AGG and 58 in NUIB, against full books of 13,338 and 58.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AGG | Weight in NUIB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIIB 4.25 03/13/34Aiib 4.25 3/13/2034 | 0.01% | 2.17% | 2.16% |
| MA 1.9 03/15/31Mastercard Inc Sr Unsecured 03/31 1.9 | 0.00% | 2.00% | 2.00% |
| EIB 0.625 10/21/27European Investment Bank Mtn 0.63% Oct 21, 2027 | 0.00% | 1.81% | 1.81% |
| AEP 2.2 08/15/31 JPublic Service Company Of Oklahoma 2.2% Aug 15, 2031 | 0.00% | 1.80% | 1.80% |
| PCG 6.7 04/01/53Pacific Gas&Elec 6.7 04/01/2053 | 0.00% | 1.73% | 1.73% |
| AFDB V5.75 PERPAfrican Development Bank 5.75% | 0.00% | 1.68% | 1.68% |
| EIB 3.75 02/14/33European Invt Bk 3.75 02/14/2033 | 0.02% | 1.44% | 1.42% |
| LNT 4.1 09/26/28Interstate Power & Light Co | 0.00% | 1.40% | 1.40% |
| NRUC 4.15 12/15/32National Rural Utilities Cooperati 4.15 12/15/2032 | 0.00% | 1.21% | 1.21% |
| EDC 4.75 06/05/34Export Development Canada 4.75% Jun 05, 2034 | 0.00% | 1.20% | 1.20% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AGG and NUIB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGG or NUIB?
AGG has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NUIB charges 0.37%. AGG is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGG or NUIB?
AGG yields 4.19% while NUIB yields 0.00%, so AGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NUIB better than AGG?
AGG has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.