AMDW vs VTI
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AMDW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMDW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $123M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 53.52% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +67.06% | +12.74% | |
| 1Y Return | +136.39% | +20.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 120.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
AMDW vs VTI Performance
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMDW returned +136.39% while VTI returned +20.66%. Year to date, AMDW is up 67.06% versus a gain of 12.74% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMDW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 120.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.6% for AMDW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMDW charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMDW currently yields 53.52% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AMDW and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMDW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD | 20.01% | 1.30% | 18.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMDW or VTI?
AMDW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMDW or VTI?
Over the past year AMDW returned +136.39% vs +20.66% for VTI, so AMDW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AMDW annualized +116.67% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMDW or VTI?
AMDW has been the more volatile fund at 120.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AMDW -34.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AMDW and VTI?
AMDW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMDW and VTI?
AMDW and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMDW or VTI?
AMDW yields 53.52% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AMDW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.