AOK vs QQQ
iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
AOK has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOK | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $787M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.27% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +4.67% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.53% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.54% | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.55% | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2008 | Mar 10, 1999 |
AOK vs QQQ Performance
iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year AOK returned +8.53% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, AOK is up 4.67% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Over three years, AOK compounded at +9.54% per year against +26.25% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +3.55% and +15.39% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 6.0% for AOK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.9% for AOK and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOK charges 0.15% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $18 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOK currently yields 3.27% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
AOK and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 111 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOK or QQQ?
AOK has an expense ratio of 0.15% while QQQ charges 0.18%. AOK is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOK or QQQ?
Over the past year AOK returned +8.53% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), AOK annualized +3.79% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOK or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 6.0% for AOK. Worst drawdown: AOK -18.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both AOK and QQQ?
AOK and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOK and QQQ?
AOK and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 111 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOK or QQQ?
AOK yields 3.27% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so AOK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.