ASHR vs SCHD
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. ASHR offers more diversification with 284 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASHR | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.09% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 288 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +4.92% | +25.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.20% | +32.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.18% | +15.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.67% | +9.70% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.0% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.3% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2013 | Oct 20, 2011 |
ASHR vs SCHD Performance
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ASHR returned +24.20% while SCHD returned +32.31%. Year to date, ASHR is up 4.92% versus a gain of 25.33% for SCHD.
Over three years, ASHR compounded at +11.18% per year against +15.40% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -0.67% and +9.70% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.45% annualized vs +5.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASHR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.0% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.3% for ASHR and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASHR charges 0.65% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $6 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASHR currently yields 2.09% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
ASHR and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 384 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASHR or SCHD?
ASHR has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASHR or SCHD?
Over the past year ASHR returned +24.20% vs +32.31% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), ASHR annualized +5.84% vs +11.45% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASHR or SCHD?
ASHR has been the more volatile fund at 24.0% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: ASHR -51.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both ASHR and SCHD?
ASHR and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASHR and SCHD?
ASHR and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 384 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASHR or SCHD?
ASHR yields 2.09% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.