ASHR vs VOO
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ASHR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASHR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.09% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 288 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +5.13% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.75% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.39% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.35% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2013 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ASHR vs VOO Performance
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASHR returned +22.75% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, ASHR is up 5.13% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, ASHR compounded at +11.39% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.35% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +5.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASHR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.3% for ASHR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASHR charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASHR currently yields 2.09% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ASHR and VOO share 0 holdings out of 789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASHR or VOO?
ASHR has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASHR or VOO?
Over the past year ASHR returned +22.75% vs +21.63% for VOO, so ASHR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), ASHR annualized +5.86% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASHR or VOO?
ASHR has been the more volatile fund at 24.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ASHR -51.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ASHR and VOO?
ASHR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASHR and VOO?
ASHR and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASHR or VOO?
ASHR yields 2.09% while VOO yields 1.09%, so ASHR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.