ASHR vs IVV
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASHR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.24% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 287 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +2.79% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.85% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.76% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.18% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2013 | May 15, 2000 |
ASHR vs IVV Performance
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ASHR returned +15.85% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, ASHR is up 2.79% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, ASHR compounded at +11.76% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.18% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASHR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.3% for ASHR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASHR charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASHR currently yields 2.24% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ASHR and IVV share 0 holdings out of 789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASHR or IVV?
ASHR has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASHR or IVV?
Over the past year ASHR returned +15.85% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), ASHR annualized +5.66% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASHR or IVV?
ASHR has been the more volatile fund at 24.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ASHR -51.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ASHR and IVV?
ASHR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASHR and IVV?
ASHR and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASHR or IVV?
ASHR yields 2.24% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ASHR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.