ASHR vs IVV
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ASHR or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ASHR is less concentrated, with 23.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASHR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.24% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 287 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +0.96% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.01% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.76% | +21.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.57% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.9% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.3% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,239 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.8%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2013 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2013 to Sep 11, 2026 (12.8 years).
ASHR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.8 years both funds cover.
ASHR vs IVV Performance
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ASHR returned +6.01% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, ASHR is up 0.96% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Over three years, ASHR compounded at +10.76% per year against +21.27% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -1.57% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.72% annualized vs +5.49%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASHR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.9% compared with 14.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.3% for ASHR and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASHR charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASHR currently yields 2.24% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 283 holdings in ASHR and 505 in IVV, totalling 99.5% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 283 positions we hold weights for in ASHR and 505 in IVV, against full books of 287 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ASHR (99.3% of the fund), and 0 for ASHR that do not appear in IVV (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ASHR and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASHR or IVV?
ASHR has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ASHR or IVV?
Over the past year ASHR returned +6.01% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), ASHR annualized +5.49% vs +12.72% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ASHR or IVV?
ASHR has been the more volatile fund at 23.9% annualized versus 14.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ASHR -51.3% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both ASHR and IVV?
ASHR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASHR or IVV?
ASHR yields 2.24% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ASHR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ASHR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ASHR is less concentrated, with 23.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.