ASIA vs IVV
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ASIA delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASIA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $52M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 74 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.17% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.50% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.89% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Matthews Asia Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
ASIA vs IVV Performance
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) is a ETF from Matthews Asia Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ASIA returned +36.50% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, ASIA is up 18.17% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, ASIA compounded at +18.89% per year against +22.08% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, ASIA has the edge at +18.89% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASIA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.9% for ASIA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASIA charges 0.79% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASIA currently yields 0.91% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ASIA and IVV share 0 holdings out of 562 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASIA or IVV?
ASIA has an expense ratio of 0.79% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASIA or IVV?
Over the past year ASIA returned +36.50% vs +21.89% for IVV, so ASIA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ASIA annualized +18.89% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASIA or IVV?
ASIA has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ASIA -23.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ASIA and IVV?
ASIA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASIA and IVV?
ASIA and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 562 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASIA or IVV?
ASIA yields 0.91% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.