ASIA vs VYM
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ASIA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASIA | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $52M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 74 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +17.69% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.06% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.74% | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Matthews Asia Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
ASIA vs VYM Performance
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) is a ETF from Matthews Asia Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASIA returned +36.06% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, ASIA is up 17.69% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Over three years, ASIA compounded at +18.74% per year against +18.72% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, ASIA has the edge at +18.74% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASIA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.9% for ASIA and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASIA charges 0.79% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $4 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASIA currently yields 0.91% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
ASIA and VYM share 0 holdings out of 660 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASIA or VYM?
ASIA has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASIA or VYM?
Over the past year ASIA returned +36.06% vs +22.16% for VYM, so ASIA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ASIA annualized +18.74% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASIA or VYM?
ASIA has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ASIA -23.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both ASIA and VYM?
ASIA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASIA and VYM?
ASIA and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 660 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASIA or VYM?
ASIA yields 0.91% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.